Re: 2016-01 Commitfest

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2016-01 Commitfest
Date: 2016-01-25 18:02:02
Message-ID: 20160125180202.GA517026@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-01-25 13:36:04 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > We still have 41 patches that haven't gotten enough review though. The
> > bad part about it is that there's a number of patches that have been
> > bouncing for many commitfests now. Here's a list of the patches with
> > the most such actions (both in Needs Review and Ready for Committer
> > state):
>
> > * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/260/
> > checkpoint continuous flushing
>
> FWIW, I've been working and benchmarking this a lot over the last
> weeks. After finally nailing down the performance regression due to wal
> writer, thins are looking good. I plan to post an updated version soon.

Excellent. I assume the walwriter bug is going to get fixed separately,
probably backpatched too?

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-01-25 18:04:12 Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-01-25 17:56:57 Re: Set search_path + server-prepared statements = cached plan must not change result type