Re: Interesting read on SCM upending software and hardware architecture

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Interesting read on SCM upending software and hardware architecture
Date: 2016-01-18 06:44:08
Message-ID: 20160118064408.GC13585@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 11:13:33PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 02:30:06PM -0600, Jim Nasby wrote:
> > https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2874238 discusses how modern
> > Storage Class Memory (SCM), such as PCIe SSD and NVDIMMs are
> > completely upending every assumption made about storage. To put
> > this in perspective, you can now see storage latency that is
> > practically on-par with things like lock acquisition[1].
>
> How is this different from Fusion I/O devices, which have been
> around for years?

Price.

As these things come down in price, it'll start being more and more
reasonable to treat rotating media as exotic.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-01-18 07:10:56 Re: PGCon 2016 call for papers
Previous Message Ioseph Kim 2016-01-18 06:29:26 Re: PGCon 2016 call for papers