Re: dynloader.h missing in prebuilt package for Windows?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Olson, Ken" <Ken(dot)Olson(at)pega(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net" <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
Subject: Re: dynloader.h missing in prebuilt package for Windows?
Date: 2016-01-04 18:06:53
Message-ID: 20160104180653.GB1309@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 12:59:26PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 12:35:02PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> If we're willing to allow 9.4.6 to install different files than 9.4.5
> >> does, I don't see why it's a problem for 9.5.1. But having said that,
> >> I agree that this seems pretty low-risk, and so IMO we might as well
> >> ship it sooner not later.
>
> > Well, as I said, I can't test the patch, which made me lean toward
> > 9.5.1.
>
> That's what the buildfarm is for ... but ...
>
> I would have been fine with you pushing this yesterday, but now it's
> too late to get a buildfarm cycle on it. Please hold for 9.5.1.

Oh, I forgot about the buildfarm testing. Good point. OK, hold for
9.5.1.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Atri Sharma 2016-01-04 18:07:05 Accessing non catalog table in backend
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-01-04 17:59:26 Re: dynloader.h missing in prebuilt package for Windows?