Re: dynloader.h missing in prebuilt package for Windows?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Olson, Ken" <Ken(dot)Olson(at)pega(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net" <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
Subject: Re: dynloader.h missing in prebuilt package for Windows?
Date: 2016-01-04 17:56:08
Message-ID: 20160104175608.GA1309@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 12:35:02PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Dec 31, 2015, at 1:04 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Let's hold this for 9.5.1 and all minor releases will get it at the same
> >> time.
>
> > I vote for going ahead with this at once. It seems low risk, and having 9.5.1 install different files from 9.5.0 seems like an unnecessary annoyance.
>
> If we're willing to allow 9.4.6 to install different files than 9.4.5
> does, I don't see why it's a problem for 9.5.1. But having said that,
> I agree that this seems pretty low-risk, and so IMO we might as well
> ship it sooner not later.

Well, as I said, I can't test the patch, which made me lean toward
9.5.1.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-01-04 17:56:23 Re: Building pg_xlogdump reproducibly
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2016-01-04 17:55:16 Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review