| From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: Core dump with nested CREATE TEMP TABLE |
| Date: | 2016-01-02 00:55:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20160102005542.GA2951035@tornado.leadboat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 11:04:11PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> *************** AtSubAbort_Portals(SubTransactionId mySu
> --- 909,966 ----
> {
> Portal portal = hentry->portal;
>
> + /* Was it created in this subtransaction? */
> if (portal->createSubid != mySubid)
> + {
> + /* No, but maybe it was used in this subtransaction? */
> + if (portal->activeSubid == mySubid)
> + {
...
> + if (portal->status == PORTAL_ACTIVE)
> + MarkPortalFailed(portal);
Do you have a test case that reaches this particular MarkPortalFailed() call?
My attempts stumbled over the fact that, before we reach here, each of the
three MarkPortalActive() callers will have already called MarkPortalFailed()
in its PG_CATCH block. ("make check" does not reach this call.)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2016-01-02 02:58:59 | Re: buffer README is out of date |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2016-01-02 00:50:15 | WIP: Failover Slots |