Re: fix log_min_duration_statement logic error

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Agreed. elog is the proper place, because then you guarantee that it is
> all on one line. Is that OK? Do we have elogs that we want over
> several lines? Is this something we can do at this stage in beta?

As to the latter: sure. We've already hacked the formatting of the log
output quite a bit since 7.3. Better to hit them with this too now,
than spread the pain over multiple releases.

As to the former: the only thing that seems debatable to me is what to
do about the layout of the new multi-part ereport() messages. I would
be inclined to go for one line per part, viz
ERROR: blah blah blah
DETAIL: blah blah\nblah blah
HINT: blah blah\nblah blah\nblah blah
but perhaps someone would like to argue for somehow collapsing all this
to one line? If so, how exactly?

regards, tom lane