| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review |
| Date: | 2015-12-20 13:24:32 |
| Message-ID: | 20151220132432.GO3685@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael,
* Michael Paquier (michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > OK, let's do so then by having this one fall under pg_backup. Let's
> > not be my grunting concerns be an obstacle for this patch, and we
> > could still change it afterwards in this release beta cycle anyway
> > based on user feedback.
>
> Three weeks later...
> This thread has not moved a iota. Stephen, are you planning to work
> more on this patch? It seems that we found a consensus. If nothing
> happens, I am afraid that the destiny of this patch will be to be
> returned with feedback, it is the 5th CF where this entry is
> registered.
Ok, seems you're right that we've got consensus on it. I'll post an
updated patch later today which I'll plan to commit.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-12-20 13:28:57 | Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-12-20 13:17:16 | Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review |