Re: [PoC] Asynchronous execution again (which is not parallel)

Thank you a lot!

At Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:51:41 +0900, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote in <566E831D(dot)1050703(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2015/12/14 17:34, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> > At Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:40:20 -0500, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote
> >> But is it important enough to be worthwhile? Maybe, maybe not. I
> >> think we should be working toward a world where the Gather is at the
> >> top of the plan tree as often as possible, in which case
> >> asynchronously kicking off a Gather node won't be that exciting any
> >> more - see notes on the "parallelism + sorting" thread where I talk
> >> about primitives that would allow massively parallel merge joins,
> >> rather than 2 or 3 way parallel.
> >
> > Could you give me the subject of the thread? Or important message
> > of that.
>
> I think that would be the following thread:
>
> * parallelism and sorting *
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoYh4zsQMgqiyra7zO1RBBvG1qHn1fJT5q0Fpw+Q0xAjrg@mail.gmail.com

Thank you for the pointer. I'll read it.

# It's hard for me to do eyeball-greping on English texts..

regards,

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center