Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual

From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com, fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual
Date: 2015-12-02 01:35:31
Message-ID: 20151202.103531.239269610.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Sorry, I made a mistake.

At Wed, 02 Dec 2015 10:29:17 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote in <20151202(dot)102917(dot)50152198(dot)horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
> Hello, thank you for editing.
>
> At Tue, 1 Dec 2015 14:56:54 -0500, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CA+TgmoY+1Cq0bjXBP+coeKtkOMbpUMVQsfL2fJQY+ws7Nu=wgg(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:
> > > This patch is not tested by actual FDW extensions, so it is helpful
> > > to enhance postgres_fdw to run the alternative sub-plan on EPQ recheck.
> >
> > I have done some editing and some small revisions on this patch.
> > Here's what I came up with. The revisions are mostly cosmetic, but I
> > revised it a bit so that the signature of GetForeignPlan need not
> > change. Also, I made nodeForeignScan.c do some of the outer plan
> > handling automatically, and I fixed the compile breaks in
> > contrib/file_fdw and contrib/postgres_fdw.
> >
> > Comments/review/testing are very welcome.
>
> Applied on HEAD with no error. Regtests of core, postgres_fdw and
> file_fdw finished with no error.
>
>
> nodeScan.c:
>
> The comments in nodeScan.c looks way clearer. Thank you for rewriting.
>
> nodeForeignscan.c:
>
> Is this a mistake?
>
> > @@ -205,6 +218,11 @@ ExecInitForeignScan(ForeignScan *node, EState *estate, int eflags)
> > scanstate->fdwroutine = fdwroutine;
> > scanstate->fdw_state = NULL;
> >
> > + /* Initialize any outer plan. */
> -> + if (outerPlanState(scanstate))
> +> + if (outerPlanState(node))
> > + outerPlanState(scanstate) =

No, the above is wrong.

-> + if (outerPlanState(scanstate))
+> + if (outerPlan(node))
> + outerPlanState(scanstate) =

> createplan.c, planmain.h:
>
> I agree with reverting the signature of GetForeignPlan.
>
> fdwapi.h:
>
> The reverting of the additional parameter of ForeignScan leaves
> only change of indentation of the last parameter.
>
> fdwhandler.sgml:
>
> This is easy to understand to me. Thank you.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2015-12-02 02:15:22 Re: [PoC] Asynchronous execution again (which is not parallel)
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2015-12-02 01:30:44 Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual