| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |
| Date: | 2015-11-26 18:52:09 |
| Message-ID: | 20151126185209.GN4073@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Not working with the cmake version shipped in current distributions would
> almost certainly cause us to reject this patch. Adding a new build
> dependency is bad enough; adding one that isn't easily available is a
> show-stopper. You'd better think in terms of what's provided with RHEL6,
> not RHEL7, as the minimum baseline on the Red Hat side. I'm not sure what
> the oldest active LTS distribution is in the Debian world, but I'm pretty
> sure it won't have cmake 3.
Current Debian Stable (wheezy) has cmake 3.0.2. Oldstable (jessie) has
2.8.4.
As for Ubuntu, according to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS the oldest still
supported is 12.04 (Precise Pangolin) and they have 2.8.7:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/cmake
For these systems, the CMake 2.8 functionality would be enough. No need
to go back to 2.6.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2015-11-26 19:42:37 | Re: New email address |
| Previous Message | YUriy Zhuravlev | 2015-11-26 17:06:09 | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |