| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: parallelism and sorting |
| Date: | 2015-11-23 22:38:27 |
| Message-ID: | 20151123223827.GB5112@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 05:01:43PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [snip]
>
> If we had a Parallel Index Scan which worked like a Parallel Seq
> Scan,
That sounds like a very handy thing to have. Any idea whether it's
possible for 9.6? Is there any of the Parallel Seq Scan code that
looks like it could be reused or slightly generalized for the
implementation?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-11-23 23:06:39 | Optimizing away second VACUUM heap scan when only BRIN indexes on table |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-11-23 22:04:36 | Re: custom function for converting human readable sizes to bytes |