Re: Default Roles (was: Additional role attributes)

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Default Roles (was: Additional role attributes)
Date: 2015-11-17 20:36:26
Message-ID: 20151117203626.GW3685@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael,

* Michael Paquier (michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> Will there be any work on this patch for this commit fest or not? This
> is being carried around for a couple of months now with not much
> progress. This thread is idle for 4 months now.

This thread and the other one kind of merged. The last update on the
overall discussion is here:

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150930111120.GM3685@tamriel.snowman.net

Which was closer to 1.5 months ago and was the requested split of the
patch, which mainly needs to get review and/or buy-in from others on the
reservation of the role prefix 'pg_' (which is the first patch).

I'm happy to update the patches if they don't apply, of course, but
they're relatively straight-forward and we just need to agree that
reservation of the prefix is acceptable and then I can just commit
them.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-11-17 20:37:12 Re: Erroneous cost estimation for nested loop join
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2015-11-17 20:23:06 Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.