Re: Per-table log_autovacuum_min_duration is actually documented

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Per-table log_autovacuum_min_duration is actually documented
Date: 2015-11-11 21:27:58
Message-ID: 20151111212757.GL614468@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier wrote:

> I recall that we had some talks about grouping all the relopts into a
> single documentation section, perhaps not having one is at the origin
> of the confusion?

I think you're remembering this:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150402205713.GB22175@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2015-11-11 23:57:09 Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-11-11 21:18:01 Re: Per-table log_autovacuum_min_duration is actually documented