| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Дмитрий Воронин <carriingfate92(at)yandex(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump |
| Date: | 2015-10-29 16:14:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20151029161419.GE401@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 07:03:12PM +0300, Дмитрий Воронин wrote:
>
> >> Maybe it will be a good idea to make a dumper with some dumping levels:
> >> - all cluster
> >> - global objects
> >> - database level
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand. Is there some utility in dividing this
> > into these particular levels?
>
> -all cluster -- it's what pg_dumpall and pg_dump do.
> - global objects -- it's dumping tablespaces, roles, database(structure).
> - database level -- it's dumping all inside one database.
More specifically, I am not quite understanding the distinction
between "all cluster" and "global objects."
What do you have in mind on the implementation side? Do you think
pg_dump is a suitable baseline, or were you thinking of something
different, and if so, what?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2015-10-29 16:22:15 | Re: pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2015-10-29 16:06:27 | Re: Personal note: changing employers |