| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Дмитрий Воронин <carriingfate92(at)yandex(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump |
| Date: | 2015-10-29 15:54:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20151029155441.GD401@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 06:37:46PM +0300, Дмитрий Воронин wrote:
> David, do you want to have one dumper program for postgres?
Yes, and pg_dump appears to be the best candidate for evolution into
one.
That there are two separate ones is the result of design decisions
that may very well have made sense at the time they were made, but no
longer do.
> Maybe it will be a good idea to make a dumper with some dumping levels:
> - all cluster
> - global objects
> - database level
I'm not sure I understand. Is there some utility in dividing this
into these particular levels?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Дмитрий Воронин | 2015-10-29 16:03:12 | Re: pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Дмитрий Воронин | 2015-10-29 15:37:46 | Re: pg_dump |