| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | fortin(dot)christian(at)videotron(dot)ca |
| Cc: | pgsql-translators(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] UTF-32 support in PostgreSQL ? |
| Date: | 2015-10-26 18:09:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20151026180914.GG620@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-translators |
On 2015-10-23 23:29:53 -0400, fortin(dot)christian(at)videotron(dot)ca wrote:
> Is PostgreSQL support UNICODE UTF-32 characters ?
No.
> If not, I think it's a must to be internationnal.
Why? I think Unicode support is a must, but I don't see why utf-32
support is. Postgres supports UTF-8, and I haven't heard any convincing
arguments why that's not sufficient.
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-10-26 18:11:56 | Re: [HACKERS] UTF-32 support in PostgreSQL ? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-10-26 17:58:52 | Re: Proposal: Trigonometric functions in degrees |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-10-26 18:11:56 | Re: [HACKERS] UTF-32 support in PostgreSQL ? |
| Previous Message | fortin.christian | 2015-10-24 03:29:53 | UTF-32 support in PostgreSQL ? |