Re: Allow ssl_renegotiation_limit in PG 9.5

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org>
Cc: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <Pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Allow ssl_renegotiation_limit in PG 9.5
Date: 2015-10-16 13:48:34
Message-ID: 20151016134834.GJ6851@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-10-16 16:41:16 +0300, Shay Rojansky wrote:
> > If not, the only solution I can see is for PostgreSQL to not protest if it
> > sees the
> > parameter in the startup packet.
> >
>
> Yeah, that's the ideal solution here as far as I'm concerned.

Well, it seems that's where we're ending up then. Could you prepare a
patch?

Regards,

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Glenn Zhu 2015-10-16 13:54:52 Re: Error creating gin index on jsonb columns
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-10-16 13:43:35 Re: Error creating gin index on jsonb columns