Re: Proposal: pg_confcheck - syntactic & semantic validation of postgresql configuration files

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amir Rohan <amir(dot)rohan(at)zoho(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hacker mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: pg_confcheck - syntactic & semantic validation of postgresql configuration files
Date: 2015-10-13 21:14:19
Message-ID: 20151013211419.GW4405@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amir Rohan wrote:

> I've been considering that. Reusing the parser would ensure no errors
> are introduces by having a different implementation, but on the other
> hand involving the pg build in installation what's intended as a
> lightweight, independent tool would hurt.
> Because it's dubious whether this will end up in core, I'd like
> "pip install pg_confcheck" to be all that is required.

Maybe just compile a single file in a separate FRONTEND environment?

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2015-10-13 21:28:24 Re: Performance improvement for joins where outer side is unique
Previous Message Amir Rohan 2015-10-13 21:02:48 Re: Proposal: pg_confcheck - syntactic & semantic validation of postgresql configuration files