Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support
Date: 2015-10-06 13:55:26
Message-ID: 20151006135526.GI30738@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-10-06 06:42:17 -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> *sigh*, no you’re not missing anything. In moving to the cache and
> marking things just as “shippable” I’ve lost the test that ensures
> they are shippable for this *particular* server (which only happens in
> the lookup stage). So yeah, the cache will be wrong in cases where
> different servers have different extension opti ons.

Should be easy enough to fix - just add the server's oid to the key.

But I guess you're already on that.

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Ramsey 2015-10-06 14:01:53 Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2015-10-06 13:46:38 Re: run pg_rewind on an uncleanly shut down cluster.