| From: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Keith Fiske <keith(at)omniti(dot)com>, CS DBA <cs_dba(at)consistentstate(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WAL Shipping and streaming replication |
| Date: | 2015-09-29 11:12:51 |
| Message-ID: | 20150929111251.GA20184@depesz.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:53:37PM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> The issue was reported as omnipitr-cleanup is SLOOOW, so we run
> purgewal by hand, because the cleanup is so slow it can't keep up. But
> running it by hand is not supported.
>
> We fixed the problem though, we wrote out own script and are now
> moving to wal-e for all future stuff.
where or when was it reported?
In issue list I see two issues (closed of course) for cleanup, but they
don't mention slowness.
depesz
--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ramesh T | 2015-09-29 13:13:53 | Re: Format |
| Previous Message | rahulraveendran | 2015-09-29 09:34:31 | Re: pgpgout/s without swapping--what does it mean? |