| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work |
| Date: | 2015-09-23 00:23:27 |
| Message-ID: | 20150923002327.GH1573@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-09-22 20:14:11 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I'm not disagreeing with any of that. I'm just disagreeing with you
> on the likelihood that we're going to make things better vs. making
> them worse. But, really, I've said everything I have to say about
> this. You have a commit bit.
I'm not going to push backpatch this to 9.3/9.4 without you being on
board. For that I think you're unfortunately too often right, and this
is too critical. But I'm also not going to develop an alternative
stopgap for those versions, since I have no clue how that'd end up being
better.
The only alternative proposal I have right now is to push this to
9.5/9.6 (squashed with a followup patch removing legacy truncations) and
then push the patch including legacy stuff to 9.3/4 after the next set
of releases.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-09-23 01:01:29 | unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-09-23 00:14:11 | Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work |