From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Luisa Barnett <barnettluisa(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #13589: content error |
Date: | 2015-09-16 20:55:13 |
Message-ID: | 20150916205513.GR88970@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > Thanks for taking a look at this. I don't want my attempt to steer things
> > in a more conservative direction to result in the original complaint not
> > being fixed, so how about considering just this change to start.sgml for
> > now:
>
> > <para>
> > Possibly, your site administrator has already created a database
> > - for your use. He should have told you what the name of your
> > + for your use and told you what the name of your
> > database is. In that case you can omit this step and skip ahead
> > to the next section.
> > </para>
>
> That would work, but I still wonder why we need that second sentence
> at all.
+1
Possibly, your site administrator has already created a database
+ for your use. In that case you can omit this step and skip ahead
to the next section.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | adamwizon | 2015-09-16 21:48:38 | BUG #13622: unsafe use of relative rpath libpq.5.dylib |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2015-09-16 15:52:51 | Re: [Bug / Question ] " authentication_timeout " is invalid. |