Re: [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Charles Clavadetscher <clavadetscher(at)swisspug(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY
Date: 2015-09-13 12:30:38
Message-ID: 20150913123038.GF3685@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Charles,

* Charles Clavadetscher (clavadetscher(at)swisspug(dot)org) wrote:
> Well I gave it a try. I am still not very well aware how the process for
> suggesting or submitting corrections work, but this is as far as I got.
> In the attachment is a patch for the missing entry for POLICY in the
> documentation on COMMENT that I mentioned earlier on pgsql-docs.

Thanks! This looks mostly correct but only goes half-way (not that
there's a lot to this change ;). The 'policy_name' parameter which is
added should also be added to the 'Parameters' list below, and the
description under 'table_name' updated to reflect that it's used for
policies also.

There should probably be an example added also, since it looks like
there are examples of pretty much all the other COMMENT ON
types.

Thanks again!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charles Clavadetscher 2015-09-13 12:42:24 Re: [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY
Previous Message Charles Clavadetscher 2015-09-13 06:28:04 Re: Missing COMMENT ON POLICY - update

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charles Clavadetscher 2015-09-13 12:42:24 Re: [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY
Previous Message David Rowley 2015-09-13 07:43:19 Re: WIP: Make timestamptz_out less slow.