Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.
Date: 2015-09-11 21:34:51
Message-ID: 20150911213451.GC2912@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Rahila Syed wrote:
> >This doesn't seem to compile
> Oh. It compiled successfully when applied on HEAD on my machine. Anyways,
> the OID is changed to 3309 in the attached patch. 3308 / 3309 both are part
> of OIDs in unused OID list.

I think Thom may have patched on top of some other patch.

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2015-09-11 23:11:33 Re: jsonb_concat: make sure we always return a non-scalar value
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2015-09-11 21:13:38 Re: Re: [PATCH] pg_upgrade fails when postgres/template1 isn't in default tablespace