| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
| Subject: | Re: Is this a bug? |
| Date: | 2015-09-05 12:03:20 |
| Message-ID: | 20150905120320.GA3133@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 09:40:10AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> > <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > > Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> > >
> > >> Why this patch was reverted one day after applied [1]? I didn't see
> any
> > >> discussion around it.
> > >
> > > Contributors whose patches are getting committed should really
> subscribe
> > > to pgsql-committers.
> >
> > I would have thought discussion of committed patches should be moved
> > to -hackers.
>
> I agree, but it happens anyway quite frequently. Since recently, I make
> a point of changing the CC from -committers to -hackers, but due to
> force of habit I often forget.
>
>
> Noted. I usually don't do that.
I am thinking we should all agree if we should redirect commit comments
to hackers, or not, so we are consistent.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2015-09-05 12:15:26 | Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2015-09-05 10:48:01 | Re: track_commit_timestamp and COMMIT PREPARED |