| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
| Subject: | Re: Is this a bug? |
| Date: | 2015-09-03 18:52:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20150903185216.GF2912@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> >
> >> Why this patch was reverted one day after applied [1]? I didn't see any
> >> discussion around it.
> >
> > Contributors whose patches are getting committed should really subscribe
> > to pgsql-committers.
>
> I would have thought discussion of committed patches should be moved
> to -hackers.
I agree, but it happens anyway quite frequently. Since recently, I make
a point of changing the CC from -committers to -hackers, but due to
force of habit I often forget.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2015-09-03 19:12:04 | PG_CATCH used without PG_RETHROW |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2015-09-03 18:50:46 | Re: [PROPOSAL] Inputs on forcing VACUUM VERBOSE to write timestamp |