Re: WIP: About CMake v2

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date: 2015-09-01 14:37:54
Message-ID: 20150901143754.GI31526@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-09-01 10:32:39 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> A monolithic patch replacing the GNU make build system with a CMake build
> system sounds far too hard to write and review; we should expect to maintain
> those two build systems in parallel for awhile.

I don't buy this. I don't think we're going to decide to switch to cmake
before seing how the gmake conversion will look like. Possibly the gmake
part doesn't have to be immediately committable when we replace msvc
with cmake, but I'll definitely want to see the benefit (i.e. see a
one-source-of-truth tree) before paying.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-09-01 15:05:37 Re: Potential GIN vacuum bug
Previous Message Noah Misch 2015-09-01 14:32:39 Re: WIP: About CMake v2