Re: WIP: About CMake v2

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date: 2015-09-01 14:07:43
Message-ID: 20150901140743.GH31526@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-09-01 10:05:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Where I do *not* want to end up is maintaining *three* build systems.
> So I'll definitely resist any proposals to commit a partly-done cmake
> conversion (which I fear might seem attractive at some point).

Enthusiastically seconded.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-09-01 14:08:06 Re: icc vs. gcc-style asm blocks ... maybe the twain can meet?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-09-01 14:05:44 Re: WIP: About CMake v2