Re: Missing latex-longtable value

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Missing latex-longtable value
Date: 2015-08-31 16:24:49
Message-ID: 20150831162449.GA17858@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 03:21:50PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 01:05:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 11:48:13AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> It's a bug. Back-patch as needed.
> >
> > > Doesn't that cause translation string differences that are worse than
> > > the original bug, e.g.:
> > > psql_error("\\pset: allowed formats are unaligned, aligned, wrapped, html, asciidoc, latex, latex-longtable, troff-ms\n");
> >
> > No. When we've discussed this sort of thing in the past, people have been
> > quite clear that they'd rather have accurate messages that come out in
> > English than inaccurate-though-localized messages. Certainly we should
> > avoid gratuitous changes in back-branch localized strings, but this is a
> > factual error in the message.
>
> OK, good to know.

Patch applied back through 9.3, when longtable was added.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Qingqing Zhou 2015-08-31 16:26:50 Re: Our trial to TPC-DS but optimizer made unreasonable plan
Previous Message Dmitry Vasilyev 2015-08-31 16:14:04 Re: Scaling PostgreSQL at multicore Power8