Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Date: 2015-08-28 22:15:13
Message-ID: 20150828221513.GC18678@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 03:46:36PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-08-05 15:08:29 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> > We might later want to change some of the harder to maintain macros to
> > inline functions, but that seems better done separately.
>
> Here's a conversion for fastgetattr() and heap_getattr(). Not only is
> the resulting code significantly more readable, but the conversion also
> shrinks the code size:

Hey, the fastgetattr() macro was a work of art! ;-) (And more of my
hacks disappear.)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2015-08-28 22:23:06 Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-08-28 22:03:15 Re: Adding commit details to SGML release notes