| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 |
| Date: | 2015-08-07 17:17:32 |
| Message-ID: | 20150807171732.GD4916@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-08-07 19:11:52 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> I think the likelihood of actually breaking correct working extension
> code that uses namespace.h that'd be broken if we removed lock.h from
> namespace.h is an order of magnitude bigger than the possible impact on
> frontend code.
Same with dropping lwlock.h from lock.h. I tried both and the former
required more than 20 added headers in backend code, and the latter
about 5. I'm pretty sure the same would be true external extensions.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-08-07 17:30:46 | Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-08-07 17:11:52 | Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 |