| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Using '>' in docs |
| Date: | 2015-08-06 03:03:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20150806030357.GF13687@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:53:51PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:51:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > > I see 34 instance of "=>" in our docs. Shouldn't the '>' be escaped,
> > > e.g. =>?
> >
> > In principle, yes, though you can often get away with this as long as
> > there's not a '<' nearby ...
>
> Yeah, that's what I thought --- it seems sloppy. What I am not clear
> about is how to find other cases.
Done.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | beijing_pg | 2015-08-07 12:16:43 | BUG #13541: There is a visibility issue when run some DDL and Query. The time window is very shot |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2015-08-05 19:24:13 | Re: max_worker_processes on the standby |