Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Date: 2015-08-05 13:08:29
Message-ID: 20150805130829.GE12598@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-08-05 14:05:24 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> So unless somebody protests I'm going to prepare (and commit after
> posting) a patch to rip out the bits of code that currently depend on
> PG_USE_INLINE.

Here's that patch. I only removed code dependant on PG_USE_INLINE. We
might later want to change some of the harder to maintain macros to
inline functions, but that seems better done separately.

Regards,

Andres

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Rely-on-inline-functions-even-if-that-causes-warning.patch text/x-patch 45.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-08-05 13:08:52 Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention
Previous Message David Rowley 2015-08-05 13:04:07 Re: WIP: Make timestamptz_out less slow.