| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FSM versus GIN pending list bloat |
| Date: | 2015-08-04 14:18:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20150804141814.GF4736@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-08-04 14:59:11 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 4 August 2015 at 14:55, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>
> > On 08/04/2015 04:35 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> >
> >> This and the OP seem like 9.5 open items to me.
> >>
> >
> > Why? This is nothing new in 9.5.
>
>
> gin_pending_list_limit is new in 9.5
>
> We're in Alpha, so if something has been added and isn't very usable, we
> should change it while we can.
The only thing that variable does is change what the pending size limit
is determined by. Previously it was work_mem, now it's
gin_pending_list_limit. Imo that has pretty much nothing to do with not
registering pages as free.
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2015-08-04 14:55:22 | Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. ); |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2015-08-04 13:59:11 | Re: FSM versus GIN pending list bloat |