| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RLS restrictive hook policies |
| Date: | 2015-08-03 15:09:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20150803150934.GT3587@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dean, all,
* Stephen Frost (sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net) wrote:
> Agreed. I'm happy to commit that change and back-patch it to 9.5,
> barring objections. Given that the only way to have restrictive
> policies currently is using hooks, I don't believe there's any
> documentation update required either; of course, I'll update the comment
> to reflect this discussion/decision and make any necessary changes to
> test_rls_hooks.
Patch attached to make this change, with appropriate comment updates and
fixes to the test_rls_hooks modules.
Comments?
Thanks!
Stephen
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| rls-restrictive-hook.patch | text/x-diff | 5.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dean Rasheed | 2015-08-03 15:26:40 | Re: RLS restrictive hook policies |
| Previous Message | Anastasia Lubennikova | 2015-08-03 14:34:39 | Re: [PATCH] Microvacuum for gist. |