Re: upgrade failure from 9.5 to head

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: upgrade failure from 9.5 to head
Date: 2015-08-02 23:21:11
Message-ID: 20150802232111.GK11473@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-08-02 19:06:49 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I'm fine with fixing it, but what's the actual use case for a long lived
> shell type?

The use-case imo is that we shouldn't just break if somebody did
something stupid or was busy creating a new type while a scheduled
backup ran.

Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2015-08-03 00:20:22 Re: upgrade failure from 9.5 to head
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2015-08-02 23:06:49 Re: upgrade failure from 9.5 to head