| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore |
| Date: | 2015-07-15 08:18:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20150715081840.GC5520@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-07-14 13:09:26 -0400, Adam Brightwell wrote:
> All,
>
> >> I won't have time to do anything about this anytime soon, but I think we
> >> should fix that at some point. Shall I put this on the todo? Or do we
> >> want to create an 'open items' page that's not major version specific?
> >
> > I think adding it to the TODO would be great.
Done. It's rather telling that it took me a fair while to find a spot in
the todo list where it fits...
> I'd be willing to look/dive into this one further.
Cool.
One thing worth mentioning is that arguably the problem is caused by the
fact that we're here emitting database level information in pg_dump,
normally only done for dumpall.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-07-15 08:24:24 | Re: [DESIGN] Incremental checksums |
| Previous Message | Yourfriend | 2015-07-15 08:10:10 | Re: Could be improved point of UPSERT |