| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_file_settings view vs. Windows |
| Date: | 2015-06-28 03:48:27 |
| Message-ID: | 20150628.124827.1760969729910887430.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> I'm just wondering why we did not catch this earlier. If this is
>> because threre's no regression test case for pg_file_settings view,
>
> Yeah, exactly. Unfortunately I see no way to add a useful test, at least
> not one that will work in installcheck mode. There's no way to predict
> what will be in the view in that case. Even for "make check", the output
> would be pretty darn environment-dependent.
Is there anything like this (9.5 features not tested on Windows) other
than pg_file_settings?
Maybe SRA OSS could help in testing such features on Windows.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-06-28 03:50:29 | Re: drop/truncate table sucks for large values of shared buffers |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-06-28 03:45:49 | Re: drop/truncate table sucks for large values of shared buffers |