Re: 9.5 release notes

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: 9.5 release notes
Date: 2015-06-16 19:17:01
Message-ID: 20150616191700.GT133018@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 11:21:35AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> > For pretty much the same reason, I'm not in favor of small caps either.
> > Even assuming we can do that consistently (which I bet we can't; we
> > do not have all that much control over how web browsers render HTML),
> > it would be calling attention to itself, which is exactly not the result
> > I think we should be after.
>
> I am sure almost every browser can render smallcaps, even if it doesn't
> have a smallcaps-specific font installed --- same for PDF.

For HTML, smallcaps is a CSS property. The way it works is that you
write in lowercase, and then the browser displays smallcaps. So for the
browsers that don't do it correctly, it would just work fine by
displaying as lower case.

One trouble is how to write the SGML so that the smallcaps bits reach
the generated HTML.

I don't know about PDF.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2015-06-16 21:41:32 Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-06-16 18:58:44 Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1