Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steve Kehlet <steve(dot)kehlet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Date: 2015-06-03 18:29:40
Message-ID: 20150603182940.GD133018@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> Really, the whole question of how this code goes past the open() failure
> in SlruPhysicalReadPage baffles me. I don't see any possible way for
> the file to be created ...

Hmm, the checkpointer can call TruncateMultiXact when in recovery, on
restartpoints. I wonder if in recovery this could trigger file creation.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-06-03 18:44:18 Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Previous Message Roxanne Reid-Bennett 2015-06-03 18:04:28 Re: Database designpattern - product feature

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-06-03 18:44:18 Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-06-03 18:01:46 Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1