Re: fsync-pgdata-on-recovery tries to write to more files than previously

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: fsync-pgdata-on-recovery tries to write to more files than previously
Date: 2015-05-25 20:06:14
Message-ID: 20150525200614.GP5885@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > I've not followed this thread all that closely, but I do tend to agree
> > with the idea of "only try to mess with files that are *clearly* ours to
> > mess with."
>
> Well, that opens us to errors of omission, ie failing to fsync things we
> should have. Maybe that's an okay risk, but personally I'd judge that
> "fsync everything and ignore (some?) errors" is probably a more robust
> approach over time.

How is it possible to make errors of omission? The list of directories
in initdb is the complete set of directories that are created for a
newly-initdb'd database, no? Surely there can't be a database that
contains vital directories that are not created there? See "subdirs"
static in initdb.c.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-05-25 20:21:51 Re: fsync-pgdata-on-recovery tries to write to more files than previously
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-05-25 20:02:33 Re: Run pgindent now?