| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Run pgindent now? |
| Date: | 2015-05-25 19:08:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20150525190838.GI3908@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 03:03:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 01:10:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Some of those diffs would disappear if you'd used an up-to-date typedefs
> >> list ... not a lot, but some.
>
> > Uh, you mean a current 9.4.X typedef list? Should I try that?
>
> As we discussed upthread, if we're trying to minimize cross-branch
> pgindent differences then we probably need to use the same typedefs
> list in all branches. I believe Andrew's already set up buildfarm
> support for generating a unified typedef list for all active branches.
OK, but just consider that we are then introducing _new_ pgindent
changes into back branches that have not been modified by patches at
all.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-25 19:12:24 | Re: Run pgindent now? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-05-25 19:07:42 | Re: Run pgindent now? |