Re: 9.5 open items

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.5 open items
Date: 2015-05-18 21:28:40
Message-ID: 20150518212840.GO9458@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 05:52:22PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have processed all the open email items I can through mid-March,
> > though I do have two pg_upgrade fixes pending application today. I will
> > continue processing doc fixes and major bug fixes for 9.5, but
> > everything else I do will be for 9.6.
>
> Thanks, Bruce.
>
> Just so we're all in the same page, there are some further open items
> (both addressed and not yet addressed) in the usual Wiki page,
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Open_Items
> If you have additional unaddressed items from your mailbox scan, it
> might be a good idea to document them there. That way, there's a better
> chance that other people would help you get them solved.

Sure. Most of my items are low priority and will just be added to the
TODO list.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Harbulot 2015-05-18 22:31:17 Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)
Previous Message Ilya I. Ashchepkov 2015-05-18 21:21:18 Re: jsonb concatenate operator's semantics seem questionable