Re: Triaging the remaining open commitfest items

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Triaging the remaining open commitfest items
Date: 2015-05-14 22:58:39
Message-ID: 20150514225839.GE31667@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 06:57:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > * Bruce Momjian (bruce(at)momjian(dot)us) wrote:
> >> I will call for a vote that the freeze deadline be changed if this patch
> >> is rejected to due to time. I might lose the vote, but I am going to
> >> try because if we lose our reputation for fairness, we have lost a lot
> >> more than a week/month of release time.
>
> > I'm guessing the vote is core-only, but +1 from me in any case. I fully
> > agree that this patch has had a serious measure of effort put behind it
> > from the author and is absolutely a capability we desire and need to
> > have in core.
>
> I should think we'd have learned by now what happens when we delay a
> release date to get in some extra feature. It hasn't worked well in
> the past and I see no reason to believe the results would be any more
> desirable this time.

Right, the importance of the feature is not a reason to delay the
feature freeze.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-05-14 23:21:32 best place for "rtree" strategy numbers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-05-14 22:57:24 Re: Triaging the remaining open commitfest items