| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>, Svenne Krap <svenne(at)krap(dot)dk> |
| Subject: | Re: Final Patch for GROUPING SETS |
| Date: | 2015-05-14 06:38:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20150514063807.GF9584@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-05-14 02:32:04 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 07:50:31AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Andrew, is that a structure you could live with, or not?
> >
> > Others, what do you think?
>
> Andrew and I discussed that very structure upthread:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/87d26zd9k8.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
I don't really believe that that'd necesarily be true. I think if done
like I sketched it'll likely end up being simpler than the currently
proposed code. I also don't see why this would make combining hashing
and sorting any more complex than now. If anything the contrary.
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20141231085845.GA2148306@tornado.leadboat.com
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20141231210553.GB2159277@tornado.leadboat.com
>
> I still believe the words I wrote in my two messages cited.
I.e. that you think it's a sane approach, despite the criticism?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2015-05-14 06:39:51 | CLUSTER on brin indexes |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2015-05-14 06:36:28 | Re: proposal: contrib module - generic command scheduler |