| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE |
| Date: | 2015-05-13 18:10:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20150513181046.GT2523@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Uh, are we really using INFO to log this? I thought that was a
discouraged level to use anymore. Why not NOTICE?
Also, when multiple tables are reindexed, do we emit lines for each
index, or only for each table? If we're going to emit a line for each
index in the single-table mode, it seems more sensible to do the same
for the multi-table forms also.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-05-13 18:40:41 | Re: Abbreviated keys for Datum tuplesort (was: Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)) |
| Previous Message | Sawada Masahiko | 2015-05-13 17:49:51 | Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE |