Re: LOCK TABLE Permissions

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LOCK TABLE Permissions
Date: 2015-05-12 11:11:32
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Michael Paquier (michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Yeah, it might not be bad to have tests for all the different lock types
> > and make sure that the permissions match up. I'd probably put those
> > tests into 'permissions.sql' instead though.
> You mean privileges.sql, right? I just wrote a patch with that. I'll
> create a new thread with the patch.

Er, yes.



In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2015-05-12 12:14:35 Re: Let PostgreSQL's On Schedule checkpoint write buffer smooth spread cycle by tuning IsCheckpointOnSchedule?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2015-05-12 11:05:19 Re: "Bugs" CF?