| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: LOCK TABLE Permissions |
| Date: | 2015-05-12 11:11:32 |
| Message-ID: | 20150512111132.GP30322@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Michael Paquier (michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Yeah, it might not be bad to have tests for all the different lock types
> > and make sure that the permissions match up. I'd probably put those
> > tests into 'permissions.sql' instead though.
>
> You mean privileges.sql, right? I just wrote a patch with that. I'll
> create a new thread with the patch.
Er, yes.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2015-05-12 12:14:35 | Re: Let PostgreSQL's On Schedule checkpoint write buffer smooth spread cycle by tuning IsCheckpointOnSchedule? |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2015-05-12 11:05:19 | Re: "Bugs" CF? |