* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> I think the code is OK, but yeah, this comment should be changed to
> reflect the idea that the function will append entries to an existing
> list of name/value pairs (and thus, that head_p/tail_p are not output
> but in/out parameters).
I've pushed a fix for the comment to address this.
Thanks!
Stephen