| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: initdb -S and tablespaces |
| Date: | 2015-05-01 14:03:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20150501140315.GD22649@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
I agree that splitting the patch into two separate ones is a good one.
On 2015-05-01 09:57:28 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> If you don't object to this version, I'll commit it. I believe this
> part *should* be back-patched, but Tom seemed to disagree, for reasons
> I'm not really clear on. This is a potential data corrupting bug as
> legitimate as any other, so a back-patch seems right to me.
Agreed. Especially for WAL files this seems to be a pretty clear
correctness issue to me.
I unsurprisingly think the other patch is a good idea too. But it's
clearly *not* something for the back branches.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-05-01 14:06:42 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-05-01 14:03:01 | Re: procost for to_tsvector |