Re: initdb -S and tablespaces

From: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: initdb -S and tablespaces
Date: 2015-05-01 03:34:19
Message-ID: 20150501033419.GB17628@toroid.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 2015-04-30 16:56:17 -0700, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us wrote:
>
> As for the notion that this needs to be back-patched, I would say no.

Not even just the "fsync after crash" part? I could separate that out
from the control file changes and try to eliminate the duplication. I
think that would be worth back-patching, at least.

-- Abhijit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2015-05-01 04:02:29 Re: Reducing tuple overhead
Previous Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2015-05-01 03:29:38 Re: initdb -S and tablespaces